Mohawk Women Title Holders Objection to NYS

[Okwes]

Mohawk Women Title Holders Objection to NYS land claims/taxes/police

Another "Disclaimer" sent out by the Women Title Holders of
Kanien'ke:haka/Mohawk Nation

OBJECTION TO CONTINUING FRAUDULENT ATTEMPT TO USURP
KANION'KE:HAKA/MOHAWK JURISDICTION THROUGH FRAUDULENT LAND CLAIMS
SETTLEMENTS, TO ILLEGALLY IMPOSE TAXES AND POLICING ON OUR TERRITORY
KNOWN AS "NEW YORK STATE" AND BEYOND BY THE UNITED STATES, NEW YORK
STATE, NON-INDIAN CORPORATIONS, FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, BOARDS,
TRIBAL "GOVERNANCE" AGENCIES AND ALL OTHER "OUTSIDERS"

DATE: February 1, 2006

FROM: Women Title Holders of the Kanion'ke:haka Nation

According to Wampum 44 of our law, the Kaianereh'ko:wa, the Women
Title Holders are the "progenitors of the soil", the Caretakers of
the land, water and air of Turtle Island. We are notifying you and
the International Forum of Nations of our constitutional
jurisdiction in our land that is being violated.

Re: Invasion of Kanion'ke:haka/Mohawk constitutional jurisdiction
by the United States and New York State and other foreign entities

TO: President of United States; Governor New York State; Her
Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II; Governor General of Canada; New York
State Senate; New York State Legislature; U.S. Department of
Justice; U.S. Attorney General; Department of Interior; and other
involved parties. (Addresses at end of Public Notice).



OBJECTION TO: The attempted theft through a fraudulent land claims
settlement of unsurrendered Kanion'ke:haka Indigenous constitutional
jurisdiction by the United States, New York State, their counties
and affiliates and outside non-indigenous entities such as the New
York State incorporated tribal councils; and to your illegal attempt
to impose outside taxation and policing on us. The U.S. Supreme
Court decision, Sherill v. Oneida Nation of New York Inc. killed
federal Indian law. "Alloidial title" is a phony argument.



Our relationship is based on the Guswentha/Two
Row Wampum Agreement. The Kaianereh'ko:wa and U.S. Constitution
agreed to respect this agreement as an "alternative to war". Only
the President of the United States may contact us according to our
constitution-to-constitution relationship. All foreign agencies
cannot enter our community to enforce their colonial laws upon our
people. We must follow nation-to-nation protocol.

Sherill is federal Indian law, not constitutional.

The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Sherill v.
Oneida Indian Nation of New York Inc. was made under federal Indian
law. Congress created federal Indian law and can change it anytime
to suit its needs. Our constitutional arrangement cannot be
changed.

Using Sherill the federal government is trying
to apply "latches". Latches means that any Indian "tribe" set up
under federal Indian law that did not take a court action on their
land claims within an unspecified time cannot now do so. Indians
under federal Indian law have only those rights that are given to
them by the federal government. The constitutional Indians retain
full jurisdiction.

Twenty years ago the federal government set up illegal
municipal level "tribal" councils. St. Regis, Cayuga, Oneida,
Onondaga and out-of-state tribes were encouraged to start land
claims cases against New York State. They were to work out
a "settlement" to extinguish sovereign Indian title in exchange for
casinos. These sell-out tribal councils agreed to give up
Rotinoshon'non:we (Iroquois) land, which is most of New York State.

The Kanion'ke:haka filed a "constitutional
jurisdiction question" in the St. Regis v. New York State case. We
asked:



How did federal and state government entities get jurisdiction to
sign over unsurrendered land that is protected by the U.S.
Constitution?



Judges McCurn and Lowe of the U.S. District
Court made a decision to dismiss our question. They could site no
law and no precedents. We appealed to the Second Circuit which also
ignored the question. We then appealed to the United State Supreme
Court.

We then filed the same question in the Sherill/Oneida and
Onondaga cases.

In Sherill, the judge had learned from the "mistake" of Judges
McCurn and Lowe. They went back to the old strategy of willful
blindness to the constitutional question. By saying nothing they
thought they could close the loophole that we used to get the issue
in. We appealed because there was no final decision.

Our question involves genocide – the
deliberate attempt to destroy a people. If someone is on death row,
the court is petitioned with a "habeas corpus" to stop the
execution. No answer is the court's "final solution" reply. The
execution is then carried out.

When it's a nation, the petition is "quo
warranto". In Sherill, the court refused to answer. This made it
a "final solution" reply. We appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and
were assigned the number 05-165. This court also did not answer.
It in effect upheld the rule of law and the constitutional nation-to-
nation relationship between the Rotinoshon'non:we/Iroquois and the
United States. The U.S. and New York State cannot apply domestic
law onto the Rotinoshon'non:we. The court could only confirm that
we still have constitutional jurisdiction over New York State and
beyond. The U.S. Supreme Court killed fraudulent federal Indian
law!

Indian constitutional jurisdiction is
timeless, until there is a consensual treaty according to the
Kaianereh'ko:wa, which can't cede any land. The U.S. Constitution
specifies a treaty can only be made with the President. Latches
cannot apply to the constitution.

The United States and New York State are
trying to steal our lands again. According to the American
constitution no state can simply appropriate our land, resources and
sovereignty. The Western Sahara case states that a territory
cannot be incorporated in another state without the informed consent
of the majority of its constitutional people. This requirement has
not been met.

Allodial Title

There are no references or precedents in law
to "allodial title" in any of the constitutions, such as the
Indigenous Kaienerekowa/Great Law or the non-Indigenous U.S. or
Canadian constitutions. Allodial title means "absolute property",
not subject to anything and outside the rule of law. This concept
is being used to convert our existence into a property concept
against the rule of law. The "lawmakers" pretend that it's a
property right that can be alienated or sold.

Indigenous women's rights in the
Kaianereh'ko:wa are not "private property!" It cannot be
constitutionally taken under "eminent domain". Private property is
a federal law concept that was unconstitutionally interjected into
North America by Congress' Appropriations Act, 1871, followed by the
Canadian Parliament's Indian Act, 1876.

Indigenous people must consent to the
application of all non-Indigenous law such as "eminent domain". The
U.S. and Canada have no eminent domain on unsurrendered Indigenous
territory, which is all of Turtle Island. Our own constitution does
not allow us to consent to non-Indigenous law, or taking
compensation for selling our lands. Our lands are not for sale.

Our rights have always been a constitutional
trust, in perpetuity, according to the Kaianereh'ko:wa and the rule
of law. Our rights are strictly legal and not subject to judicial
discretion. For us, the legal constitutional remedy is the land,
not the money. The lawyers arguing for St. Regis and Oneida don't
want the land, they want the money.

The Women Titleholders are upholding
constitutional law in which time does not run out. Our land is
given absolutely to the past, present and future members of our
nation. Therefore, we do not fear the so-called laches, allodial
title, eminent domain, manifest destiny or the other fraudulent
machinations of federal, state and provincial laws. The
Kaianereh'ko:wa cannot be amended unless the whole community is
involved. It must be ratified by the entire Grand Council of the
Iroquois Confederacy.

The constitutional Oneidas did not lose their
sovereign rights because the Oneida Inc. Indians could only lose
what they pleaded, which is federal law.



Taxation and Policing

We oppose the recent illegal invitation by the St. Regis
Mohawk Tribe Inc. and the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne to allow
foreign police and tax agencies to enter the international territory
of Akwesasne, including their tribal police forces who aid and abet
these outsiders. They have no right to enter into international
agreements with: FEMA, HOMELAND SECURITY, RCMP, OPP, SQ, FBI, CIA,
BORDER PATROL, CORNWALL POLICE, MASSENA POLICE, IBET, COAST GUARD,
AKWESASNE MOHAWK POLICE SERVICE, MOHAWK TRIBAL POLICE, ATF, MINUTE
MEN, NYSTATE POLICE, NATIONAL GUARD, U.S. MILITARY SERVICES, NY
DEPT. OF TAXATION; INTERNAL REVENUE OF TAXATION; A.G. OF U.S., A.G.
OF CANADA, CANADIAN ASSN. OF POLICE CHIEFS, U.S. TREASURY DEPT.,
A.G. NYS, DEPT. OF INTERIOR, DEPT. INDIAN AFFAIRS, CANADA BORDER
SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOM AND IMMIGRATION AND CANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE
AGENCY

We have a sovereign right to control our own affairs. We
never made agreements with the United States, New York State or
Canada to pay taxes to foreign states or to have our businesses
inspected. Colonial federal, provincial and state entities imposing
your will on us without our informed consent is contrary to
international law. All your negotiations with the outside entities
known as "St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Inc." and the "Mohawk Council of
Akwesasne" must cease and desist immediately.

You have no treaty with us as designated under Article II,
Section 2, Paragraph 2, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, or under
Sections 109 and 132 of the Canadian Constitution. Any agreement
must be ratified at Onondaga and by a 2/3 vote of the U.S. Senate.
All substitutes are unconstitutional. The continuing rule of the
Kaianereh'ko:wa is expressly and explicitly confirmed by Article XI
of the 1775 Philadelphia Articles of Confederation and Article VI of
the 1789 Constitution of the United States.

See: No. 05-165: 2005. In The Supreme Court of the
United States In re Kanion'ke:haka Kaianereh'ko:wa Kanon'ses:neh,
Non-party, Petitioner/Movant/Appellant, The Canadian St. Regis Band
of Mohawk Indians, Plaintiffs, Respondents, v. The State of New
York, Defendants, Respondents. Petition for Writs of Certiorari and
Quo Warranto with Prohibition and Mandamus in Aid to Prevent
Genocide. Rules 17.1 and 20.1;

In the Supreme Court of Canada – Kanion'ke:haka
Kaianereh'ko:wa Kanon'ses:neh v. Attorney General of Canada and Her
Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, Court File: 05-CV-030785.

Whereas:

1. Jurisdiction over our ter­ritory now called "New York
State" and beyond, belongs to the Kanion'ke:haka.

2. United States and New York State and all other entities
must respect that relations with us shall be con­ducted on a nation-
to-nation basis.

3. United States and Canada never made a treaty of surrender
with the Kanion'ke:haka.

4. The denial of a nation's exis­tence constitutes genocide,
according to the many international covenants that United States and
Canada have pledged to uphold;

Therefore:

5. We demand that United States, New York State and their
corporate bodies and associates immediately cease and desist their
illegal negotiations to assume false jurisdiction or presence in any
way, shape or form on our territory.

6. Finally, we demand to be officially informed of how
international, federal, state and provincial entities can violate
international law and the rule of law by superseding our
jurisdiction over territory that we never surrendered through a
treaty or any means whatsoever.

By Kanion'ke:haka Women Title Holders

Katenies /s/ _______________________________

Towenino /s/ ______________________________

Kahentinetha /s/_________________________

℅ P.O. Box 418, Akwesasne Kanion'ke:haka (New York) 13655 Akwesasne
1-613-575-1550

Attached: Two court documents

Sent to: All media; Mohawk Casino of Akwesasne; Turning Stone
Casino; all New York Senators; all New York State Assembly members;
US Senate and Congress;

-President of United States; Secretary of Defense; The Pentagon;
Commissioner, New York State Department of Taxation; Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales; Department of the Interior; Office of
Tribal Justice; U.S. Congress; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; The
United States Army; The U.S. Navy; Central Intelligence Agency;
-Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II; Governor General of Canada; Prime
Minister, Government of Canada; Bloc Quebecois; New Democratic
Party; Liberal Party of Canada; Premier of Ontario; Attorney General
of Ontario; Royal Canadian Mounted Police; Public Safety and
Emergency Preparedness Canada; Minister of Defense Canada;
Department of Justice Canada; Attorney General of Canada; Department
of Indian
Affairs;


Mr. Javier Solana, Secretary-General of the Council of the European
Union;
-Bono; Royal Canadian Military Institute; Toronto Stock Exchange;
Montreal Stock Exchange; New York Stock Exchange; Tokyo Stock
Exchange; London Stock Exchange; Hong Kong Stock Exchange; SAM
Indexes Gmgh;
Iroquois Caucus; Mohawk Council of Kanehsatake; Six Nations Council;
Chiefs, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe Inc; Mohawk Council of Akwesasne;
Mohawk Council of Kahnawake; Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte; Cayuga
Nation of Indians Inc.; Seneca Nation of Indians; Oneida Indian
Nation of New York Inc.; Onondaga Nation; Tonawanda Band of Senecas;
Tuscarora Indian Nation; Mohawk Nation Council of Chiefs;
Kanatsiohareke; Oneida Nation; Kanion'ke:haka Kaianereh'ko:wa
Kanon'ses:ne;
Organization of American States; World Trade Organization;
International Labor Organization; International Maritime
Organization; North Atlantic Treaty Organization; UN Office of High
Commission for Human Rights; International Commission for Human
Rights; Coalition for the International Criminal Court; Pope
Benedictine XVI, Joseph Ratzinger; Shiva Vanadana; UN Forum for
Indigenous Peoples; World Intellectual Property Organization;
International Monetary Fund; World Bank; Supreme Court of the United
States;
Greenpeace International; GreenParty; Ducks Unlimited; Sierra Legal
Defence Fund; Arab League; Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela; Mr.
Evo Gonzales, President of Bolivia; Government of Israel; Government
of Palestine; DeBeers Diamonds; Exxon; British Petroleum; Shell Oil;
Petro Canada; Forestry industries in Canada; Fisheries industries in
Canada;

[blackcrowheart]

OBJECTION TO BRINGING IN
NON-NATIVE CITY GARBAGE FOR A “GASIFIER”
ON AKWESASNE OF KAIANEREH’KO:WA/GREAT LAW TERRITORY

Date: February 7, 2006
FROM: Women Title Holders of the Kanion’ke:haka Nation
According to Wampum 44 of our law, the Kaianereh’ko:wa, the Women Title
Holders are the “progenitors of the soil”. We are the Caretakers of the land,
water and air. We also have a responsibility to keep our Men in check. At
the moment they seem to be ignoring us and bowing to external pressures.
Re: We refuse to be treated like guinea pigs by outsiders who take
advantage of the economic weaknesses of some of our people. Some bright lights want
to import big city garbage, 1.5 million tons of it. Phew! They think they
can turn it into water, oxygen and gas. The only residue will be “pie in the
sky”. We have enough excrement and toxins around here, don't we? Some of
the wild life in this area has already been found to be more lethal than toxic
waste.
To: Windell R. King, Loran Thompson and Simon P. Romana of First NRG of
Akwesasne, their “secret backers”, City of Toronto Ontario, City of London
Ontario, Prime Minister of Canada, Premier of Ontario, City of Cornwall, First
Nations Indian Territory in Southwold, Ontario, Department of Indian Affairs,
Environment Canada, St. Lawrence Seaway Authority, Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe
Inc., Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, Toronto Stock Exchange, Montreal Stock
Exchange, New York Stock Exchange, Alcoa Aluminum, General Motors, Domtar,
Reynolds Aluminum, Courtaulds Chemicals and Comedy Central (Addresses at end of
Public Notices).
OBJECTION TO: bringing millions of tons of filthy garbage from the cities
of Toronto and London Ontario to Cornwall Island of Akwesasne and other
Kaianereh’ko:wa territories. We demand you all come to your senses, including the
city of Toronto, if it has any senses left. The People have not given our
permission for this wacky and dangerous exploitation of our land and
sovereignty. The waste is likely to float downstream raising pollution levels in a
river that is just beginning to benefit from major clean up initiatives.
Akwesasne is still a long way from full recovery from the pollution caused by the
aluminum, chemical and car plants that came with the St. Lawrence Seaway. Most
of the people living there can expect a shortened lifespan because of it.
The abuses of the past do not excuse increasing the levels of poison to
further destroy the inheritance of those yet to be born.
Our relationship is based on the Guswenth/Two Row Wampum Agreement. The
Kaianereh’ko:wa and the Constitution of Canada agreed to respect this agreement.
The two vessels, the ship of the white man and the canoe of the Indian,
will travel the river never crossing each other’s paths. We agreed to follow
nation-to-nation protocol. It appears these native businessmen have jumped
from the canoe into the colonial ship. Or are they straddling it?
Don’t these native businessmen realize that the purpose of bringing all the
non-native garbage onto our land is to get around their own environmental
legislation which doesn’t allow this? The city brings in the garbage to a phony
plant or one that doesn’t work. The promoters get the money and disappear.
The natives get the blame. The people will be left with a big pile of
garbage and possible liability. Cornwall Island will become the anus of the city
of Toronto. We don’t want rats to move into the ecological space that
rightfully belongs to partridges, turtles, beaver and deer.
If the process is so clean, why ship it all the way to Cornwall? Why not
process it on Harbour Front in Toronto? What are these men doing?
The proposed garbage gasifier is on sovereign territory under our
jurisdiction as respected by the conjunction of our constitution, Kaianereh’ko:wa, the
Canadian Constitution and the U.S. Constitution.
NRG et al. never brought this issue to the people. They need the informed
consent of a majority of the people to use our sovereignty in any way.
Outsiders and their native nominees and investors are attempting to use our people
and our land for their gains and interests to the detriment of our health
and future. Dumping garbage on our land violates a large number of laws. It
may even be a criminal attempt by outside interests to take advantage of our
sovereignty to violate environmental laws.
Any foreign entities such as Toronto and London with their garbage wishing
to enter our territory for any reason whatsoever must go to Rideau Hall in
Ottawa and get permission from the Governor General of Canada to talk to us.
Individuals from NRG and their “ghost” partners cannot invite outsiders onto
our territory to oppress us, contaminate our land and abuse our sovereignty.
We are registering our objection to this illegal abuse of our jurisdiction.
In Canada we took an action in the Supreme Court of Canada – Kanion’ke:haka
Kaianereh’ko:wa Kanon’ses:neh v. Attorney General of Canada and He Majesty
the Queen in Right of Ontario, Court File: 05-CV-030785. It is attached for
you to read.
The native men are going against the philosophy of the Great Law and the
Longhouse. We notify these businessmen if they wish to exploit others against
the best interests of our People, they can leave us and become Canadian and
American citizens. This kind of twisted morality fits in very well there.
Wampum 58 provides, “They have alienated themselves and have submitted themselves
to the laws of a foreign nation. They shall forfeit all birthrights and
claims on the Five Nations Confederacy and Territories”. They cannot take our
nation and our sovereignty with them. They leave and become citizens of a
foreign nation.
FURTHER OBJECTIONS:
Whereas:
1. The Canadian and U.S. Constitutions specify that relations with us
shall be conducted on a nation-to-nation basis. These businessmen, their “
backers” and clients cannot supersede this relationship. Toronto and London,
keep your garbage! If it’s so valuable, you shouldn’t be giving it away.
2. The attempt to dump all of this garbage onto our land is a
transparent attempt to commit genocide against us, according to the many international
covenants that Canada has pledged to uphold.
Therefore:
3. We demand that these parties cease and desist their garbage
project in any way, shape or form on our territory. You do not have our
consent.
4. We demand that the Governor General of Canada immediately
put a stop to this. As a matter of comity between nations, she has a duty to
keep her nations’s garbage off of our land.
By: Kanion’ke:haka Women Title Holders
Katenies /s/ ________________________
Kahentinetha /s/ __________________________
Mailing address: c/o P.O. Box 49, Kanatakon, Akwesasne H0M 1A0
Contact: [e-mail]_ (mailto:[e-mail]) 613-575-1550
Sent to:
Comedy Central; First NRG; George Bush, President of the United States;
Governor General of Canada; Attorney General of Canada; Attorney General of
Ontario; Stephen Harper, Prime Minister;
Dalton McGuinty; St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Inc.; Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte;
Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, Mohawk Council of Kahnawake; Kanion’ke:haka
Kaianereh’ko:wa Kanon’ses:neh at Akwesasne; Cayuga Nation of Indians; Seneca
Nation of Indians, Alleghany Reservation; Cattaragus Reservation; Oneida Indian
Nation of New York Inc.; Oneida Nation of the Thames; Onondaga Nation;
Tonawanda Band of Senecas; Tuscarora Indian Nation; Mohawk Nation Council of Chiefs,
Kanatsiohareke; Ganienkeh;
See: Watertown Daily Times article, Wednesday February 1, 2006
Titled: “Mohawk firm says gasifier can turn garbage into energy”