Post by blackcrowheart on Oct 17, 2006 13:59:20 GMT -5
Victory for Klamath River salmon <http://www.google.com/search>
[http://www.pww.org/images/hr-red.gif]
[http://www.pww.org/images/hr-red.gif]
www.pww.org/article/articleview/9976/1/343/
<http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/9976/1/343/>
Author: Dan Bacher <http://www.pww.org/article/author/view/593>
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 10/12/06 13:05
SACRAMENTO, Calif. � Native American tribes, commercial fishermen,
recreational anglers and environmental groups have won a huge victory
here.
In the first test of a controversial federal dam relicensing law, an
administrative law judge ruled Sept. 27 that fish passage requirements
sought by federal fishery agencies for relicensing of PacifiCorp's
Klamath River dams were "legally sound and based on solid
facts."
The ruling by Judge Parlen McKenna is a big victory for Klamath Basin
Tribes, commercial and recreational fishermen and environmental
organizations that are pushing for removal of four dams on northern
California's Klamath River in order to restore salmon, steelhead and
other fish to the watershed.
"The judge affirmed what we have been saying for years � the
river is in a lot of pain caused by PacifiCorp's dams," said
Steve Rothert of American Rivers.
Troy Fletcher, a Federal Regulatory Commission negotiator for the Yurok
Tribe, said, "The judge, in his 92-page document, ruled squarely for
the government agencies, the tribes, fishermen and environmental groups.
It is a good, positive step for the restoration of Klamath fish."
PacifiCorp, recently acquired by billionaire Warren Buffett, had
challenged the prescriptions of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and National
Marine Fisheries Service. The judge made his decision after hearing 45
hours of testimony here over a five-day period and reviewing thousands
of written pages and exhibits.
"It was a historic moment," said Fletcher. "For the first
time all the tribes, fishermen, environmentalists and federal agencies
were supporting one another as we fought off PacifiCorp's challenge.
We have never all been on the same page at once before."
The ruling occurred during a week of activity in the relicensing process
for PacifiCorp's dams. On Sept. 25, the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) issued a draft environmental impact statement
recommending only modest changes to current dam operations and a
"trap and haul" program to drive fish around the Klamath dams.
The next day, a California Coastal Conservancy report concluded that dam
removal could be done safely and affordably without leading to floods or
exposing the river to toxic sediment.
The judge's ruling could force FERC to amend the impact statement to
include a recommendation that the dams install fish ladders.
"We voiced disappointment Monday when we saw that FERC staff was
recommending a `trap and haul' plan," said Leaf Hillman,
vice chairman of the Karuk Tribe. "Today, a federal judge set the
record straight."
Dam removal would cost PacifiCorp and its ratepayers less than
installing fish ladders, according to FERC's own analysis. FERC
estimates the annual cost of removing Iron Gate and Copco dams at
approximately $14.4 million, including power losses. In comparison, the
annual cost of installing fish ladders, screens and other passage
measures as required by fisheries agencies is estimated to be $16.6
million � $2.2 million more than dam removal.
The decision found that fish passage measures would benefit salmon,
steelhead, lamprey eels and redband trout by providing access to 58
miles of habitat between the four dams. The 58 miles would also include
46 miles of habitat for the threatened coho salmon.
Fish passage would also open the way to reintroduce salmon, steelhead
and lamprey to more than 300 miles of historic habitat above the
project. The exclusion of these fish from the upper basin began with the
completion of the first dam on the Klamath in 1918.
"PacifiCorp's Klamath Dams have been a disaster," noted Glen
Spain, Northwest region director of the Pacific Coast Federation of
Fishermen's Associations. "These aging dams produce less than 2
percent of PacifiCorp's energy, but have nearly destroyed a river
that was once the third most productive salmon producing system in
America. If there are any dams that should come down, these are the
ones."
Comments on FERC's draft environmental impact statement are due in
60 days. The current license expires in March 2007. Tribes, fishermen
and other basin stakeholders will resume settlement negotiations with
PacifiCorp next month.
Klamath Basin tribal members and other residents will gather Oct. 25 at
the State Water Resources Control Board, 1001 I St., Sacramento, to ask
the board to "clean up the Klamath and save the Klamath salmon."
After a peaceful demonstration at 12:30 p.m., a public forum at 1 p.m.
will hear testimony on the importance of the Klamath River and salmon.
For more information, call or e-mail Klamath Riverkeeper Regina
Chichizola at (530) 627-3280 or klamath@riseup.net.
[http://www.pww.org/images/hr-red.gif]
[http://www.pww.org/images/hr-red.gif]
www.pww.org/article/articleview/9976/1/343/
<http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/9976/1/343/>
Author: Dan Bacher <http://www.pww.org/article/author/view/593>
People's Weekly World Newspaper, 10/12/06 13:05
SACRAMENTO, Calif. � Native American tribes, commercial fishermen,
recreational anglers and environmental groups have won a huge victory
here.
In the first test of a controversial federal dam relicensing law, an
administrative law judge ruled Sept. 27 that fish passage requirements
sought by federal fishery agencies for relicensing of PacifiCorp's
Klamath River dams were "legally sound and based on solid
facts."
The ruling by Judge Parlen McKenna is a big victory for Klamath Basin
Tribes, commercial and recreational fishermen and environmental
organizations that are pushing for removal of four dams on northern
California's Klamath River in order to restore salmon, steelhead and
other fish to the watershed.
"The judge affirmed what we have been saying for years � the
river is in a lot of pain caused by PacifiCorp's dams," said
Steve Rothert of American Rivers.
Troy Fletcher, a Federal Regulatory Commission negotiator for the Yurok
Tribe, said, "The judge, in his 92-page document, ruled squarely for
the government agencies, the tribes, fishermen and environmental groups.
It is a good, positive step for the restoration of Klamath fish."
PacifiCorp, recently acquired by billionaire Warren Buffett, had
challenged the prescriptions of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and National
Marine Fisheries Service. The judge made his decision after hearing 45
hours of testimony here over a five-day period and reviewing thousands
of written pages and exhibits.
"It was a historic moment," said Fletcher. "For the first
time all the tribes, fishermen, environmentalists and federal agencies
were supporting one another as we fought off PacifiCorp's challenge.
We have never all been on the same page at once before."
The ruling occurred during a week of activity in the relicensing process
for PacifiCorp's dams. On Sept. 25, the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) issued a draft environmental impact statement
recommending only modest changes to current dam operations and a
"trap and haul" program to drive fish around the Klamath dams.
The next day, a California Coastal Conservancy report concluded that dam
removal could be done safely and affordably without leading to floods or
exposing the river to toxic sediment.
The judge's ruling could force FERC to amend the impact statement to
include a recommendation that the dams install fish ladders.
"We voiced disappointment Monday when we saw that FERC staff was
recommending a `trap and haul' plan," said Leaf Hillman,
vice chairman of the Karuk Tribe. "Today, a federal judge set the
record straight."
Dam removal would cost PacifiCorp and its ratepayers less than
installing fish ladders, according to FERC's own analysis. FERC
estimates the annual cost of removing Iron Gate and Copco dams at
approximately $14.4 million, including power losses. In comparison, the
annual cost of installing fish ladders, screens and other passage
measures as required by fisheries agencies is estimated to be $16.6
million � $2.2 million more than dam removal.
The decision found that fish passage measures would benefit salmon,
steelhead, lamprey eels and redband trout by providing access to 58
miles of habitat between the four dams. The 58 miles would also include
46 miles of habitat for the threatened coho salmon.
Fish passage would also open the way to reintroduce salmon, steelhead
and lamprey to more than 300 miles of historic habitat above the
project. The exclusion of these fish from the upper basin began with the
completion of the first dam on the Klamath in 1918.
"PacifiCorp's Klamath Dams have been a disaster," noted Glen
Spain, Northwest region director of the Pacific Coast Federation of
Fishermen's Associations. "These aging dams produce less than 2
percent of PacifiCorp's energy, but have nearly destroyed a river
that was once the third most productive salmon producing system in
America. If there are any dams that should come down, these are the
ones."
Comments on FERC's draft environmental impact statement are due in
60 days. The current license expires in March 2007. Tribes, fishermen
and other basin stakeholders will resume settlement negotiations with
PacifiCorp next month.
Klamath Basin tribal members and other residents will gather Oct. 25 at
the State Water Resources Control Board, 1001 I St., Sacramento, to ask
the board to "clean up the Klamath and save the Klamath salmon."
After a peaceful demonstration at 12:30 p.m., a public forum at 1 p.m.
will hear testimony on the importance of the Klamath River and salmon.
For more information, call or e-mail Klamath Riverkeeper Regina
Chichizola at (530) 627-3280 or klamath@riseup.net.