Post by Okwes on Oct 12, 2006 15:02:32 GMT -5
Talking tribes
<http://hits.fredericksburg.com/storyads/storyadlandingpage?ad_id=00763A\
3>
<http://fredtalk.fredericksburg.com/postlist.php?Cat=&Board=sifrit>
<http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/102006/10102006/227811/printer_\
friendly>
<http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/102006/10102006/227811/email_st\
ory>
Due the Indians: honor, but not federal recognition Date published:
10/10/2006
fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/102006/10102006/227811
<http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/102006/10102006/227811>
Talking tribes Federal recognition for Virginia's Indians? LET'S FACE
IT. Without them, we probably wouldn't be here. Those "first contact"
Indian tribes, like the Patawomecks from our area [see our two-part
series, "A Tribe's Tale," Oct. 1-2], gave us much more than interesting
place names. They provided early colonists with food and local knowledge
and helped Jamestown survive when that English beachhead was first
established in 1607. But the relationship between American Indians and
the European colonists was an on-again, off-again affair, sealed on
occasion by intermarriage, trading, and a mutual need to survive, yet
more often marred by mutual distrust, outright hostilities, and
eventually, legal discrimination. Four hundred years down the path,
we've learned a bit more about living together and today, some of the
commonwealth's Indians are seeking federal recognition for their tribes.
Is this a status due our first residents? The answer is not easy. On
the one hand, honoring the contributions and the distinct ethnicity of
Virginia's Indians is simply right. On the other, federal status opens a
Pandora's box of problems. There are two paths to federal recognition:
the first, through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the second, through
an act of Congress. To pass muster at the BIA, Indians must prove
"substantially continuous tribal existence" and that they have
"functioned as autonomous entities throughout history until the
present." There are seven specific criteria that must be met, a high bar
that is difficult to surmount, especially in Virginia. In 1924, the
state's registrar of vital records insisted that Indians be designated
as "colored." To avoid that classification (which led to much
discrimination), some Indians simply dropped their heritage. In other
cases, records have been destroyed, for example, when courthouses were
burned in the Civil War, making it impossible to prove Indian descent.
Some tribes in America, notably the Mashantucket Pequots of Connecticut,
bypassed BIA and achieved federal recognition directly from Congress.
Sen. George Allen introduced legislation to do the same for six Virginia
tribes in 2005, but it languishes in committee. Which may be for the
best. For as important as it is to honor our Indians, federal
recognition brings with it many negative effects. It essentially creates
a state within a state: Indian reservations become autonomous, dealing
directly with the federal government on a nation-to-nation level,
bypassing the state government. Freed, then, from state taxes, property
and safety regulations, and other local laws, the reservations also are
able to establish a most lucrative enterprise: casinos. The Pequots of
Connecticut, for example, own Foxwoods Casino, cited by some as the
"biggest moneymaker in the Western Hemisphere." That may sound like a
good deal until you analyze the human suffering, social welfare, and
crime costs associated with the proliferation of gambling. The upside of
federal recognition for tribes is access to programs that help with
housing, health care, education, and economic development, and the
ability to sell artistic products. In a misguided attempt to keep
phonies from selling "Indian" goods, the Native American Arts and Crafts
Act of 1970 forbids marketing of these items by anyone other than a
member of a federally recognized tribe. That leaves out a lot of gifted
Native American artists. Would that we could recognize our Indians
without all the baggage current federal law brings. Would that we could
applaud and encourage the Indians' contributions and heritage and
provide aid as needed without creating yet another division in our
culture and opening the door to casino gambling. Until we can, federal
recognition should remain out of reach.
<http://hits.fredericksburg.com/storyads/storyadlandingpage?ad_id=00763A\
3>
<http://fredtalk.fredericksburg.com/postlist.php?Cat=&Board=sifrit>
<http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/102006/10102006/227811/printer_\
friendly>
<http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/102006/10102006/227811/email_st\
ory>
Due the Indians: honor, but not federal recognition Date published:
10/10/2006
fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/102006/10102006/227811
<http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/102006/10102006/227811>
Talking tribes Federal recognition for Virginia's Indians? LET'S FACE
IT. Without them, we probably wouldn't be here. Those "first contact"
Indian tribes, like the Patawomecks from our area [see our two-part
series, "A Tribe's Tale," Oct. 1-2], gave us much more than interesting
place names. They provided early colonists with food and local knowledge
and helped Jamestown survive when that English beachhead was first
established in 1607. But the relationship between American Indians and
the European colonists was an on-again, off-again affair, sealed on
occasion by intermarriage, trading, and a mutual need to survive, yet
more often marred by mutual distrust, outright hostilities, and
eventually, legal discrimination. Four hundred years down the path,
we've learned a bit more about living together and today, some of the
commonwealth's Indians are seeking federal recognition for their tribes.
Is this a status due our first residents? The answer is not easy. On
the one hand, honoring the contributions and the distinct ethnicity of
Virginia's Indians is simply right. On the other, federal status opens a
Pandora's box of problems. There are two paths to federal recognition:
the first, through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the second, through
an act of Congress. To pass muster at the BIA, Indians must prove
"substantially continuous tribal existence" and that they have
"functioned as autonomous entities throughout history until the
present." There are seven specific criteria that must be met, a high bar
that is difficult to surmount, especially in Virginia. In 1924, the
state's registrar of vital records insisted that Indians be designated
as "colored." To avoid that classification (which led to much
discrimination), some Indians simply dropped their heritage. In other
cases, records have been destroyed, for example, when courthouses were
burned in the Civil War, making it impossible to prove Indian descent.
Some tribes in America, notably the Mashantucket Pequots of Connecticut,
bypassed BIA and achieved federal recognition directly from Congress.
Sen. George Allen introduced legislation to do the same for six Virginia
tribes in 2005, but it languishes in committee. Which may be for the
best. For as important as it is to honor our Indians, federal
recognition brings with it many negative effects. It essentially creates
a state within a state: Indian reservations become autonomous, dealing
directly with the federal government on a nation-to-nation level,
bypassing the state government. Freed, then, from state taxes, property
and safety regulations, and other local laws, the reservations also are
able to establish a most lucrative enterprise: casinos. The Pequots of
Connecticut, for example, own Foxwoods Casino, cited by some as the
"biggest moneymaker in the Western Hemisphere." That may sound like a
good deal until you analyze the human suffering, social welfare, and
crime costs associated with the proliferation of gambling. The upside of
federal recognition for tribes is access to programs that help with
housing, health care, education, and economic development, and the
ability to sell artistic products. In a misguided attempt to keep
phonies from selling "Indian" goods, the Native American Arts and Crafts
Act of 1970 forbids marketing of these items by anyone other than a
member of a federally recognized tribe. That leaves out a lot of gifted
Native American artists. Would that we could recognize our Indians
without all the baggage current federal law brings. Would that we could
applaud and encourage the Indians' contributions and heritage and
provide aid as needed without creating yet another division in our
culture and opening the door to casino gambling. Until we can, federal
recognition should remain out of reach.